Sınıf Öğretmeliği Lisans Diploması

ISCO 08

ISCO 08

• Classroom teaching undergraduate program is a 4-year program. 53% of the courses in the program consist of basic field courses, 25% of teaching profession courses and 22% of general culture courses. In addition, students are obliged to take elective courses at the rate of 33% of their total credits. Elective courses are divided into 74% field electives and 26% general culture electives. For this reason, students can choose elective courses in the programs of both the Department of Basic Education and other departments in the Department of Basic Education according to their interests and needs. Our students can also take courses from different faculties and colleges and the Elective Courses unit of the State Conservatory according to their interests and abilities.

• Education and training is carried out in the form of formal or distance education.
• In addition, practical training is carried out in laboratories and workshops within higher education institutions. Practice opportunities are offered as a practice teacher in schools affiliated to the Ministry of National Education. 

• Understands the relationships between concepts related to classroom education.
• Knows students' developmental and learning characteristics and learning difficulties.
• Knows curricula, teaching strategies, methods and techniques, measurement and evaluation approaches related to classroom education.
• Uses the sources of information related to classroom education.
• Applies the most appropriate teaching strategies, methods and techniques by taking into account the developmental characteristics, individual differences of students, the characteristics and achievements of the subject area.
• Develops materials appropriate to the gains in the Classroom Education curriculum and the needs of the student.
• Recognizes himself/herself as an individual with his/her creative, strong and weak sides.
• Fulfills his/her responsibilities effectively by taking part in individual and group studies.
• Actively uses ways of accessing information.
• Develop a positive attitude towards lifelong learning.
• Actively participates in artistic and cultural activities.
• Carries out professional projects and activities for the social environment with a sense of social responsibility.
• Uses information and communication technologies effectively.
• Acts in accordance with the legislation regulating the duties, rights and responsibilities related to the profession.
• Knows the importance of school-family-student interaction and comprehends the studies for family participation.
• Communicates effectively and efficiently with students and colleagues.
• Gains the vital importance of education and training.
• Establishes a connection between national culture and universal values.
• Participates in social and cultural activities.

Has advanced level of the key competencies listed below.

• Literacy competence
• Multilingual competence
• Mathematical competence and competence in science
• Digital competence
• Personal, social and learning to learn competence
• Citizenship competence
• Entrepreneurial competence
• Cultural awareness and expressive competence

Mid-term evaluation

ARTICLE 3- (1) Mid-term evaluation tools for a course consist of mid-term exams, quizzes, fieldwork, practice, homework, project, workshop, seminar, continuation, laboratory and other studies.

(2) Except for courses for which the relevant unit board of directors has decided otherwise, at least one mid-term exam must be held for a course.

(3) Each mid-term evaluation tool is graded out of 100 points. No success evaluation method is used in the grading of these evaluation tools and no letter success grade is given. The letter success grade is given after all evaluation tools, including the end-of-term exam, are graded.

(4) The contribution rates (weights) of the mid-term evaluation tools for which students are responsible to the success grade are specified in the Course Application Form. These rates are taken as the basis for the evaluation of the relevant course.

(5) The contribution of the mid-term exam determined in the mid-term evaluation to the success grade cannot be less than 40% or more than 60%.

(6) The instructor responsible for a course prepares a Course Application Form in accordance with the format determined by the relevant unit board for the relevant course and submits it to the relevant Department Head one week before the beginning of the relevant semester. The course instructor distributes the Course Application Form to all students in the first lesson. This form includes information about the course, weekly schedule, purpose of the course, outcomes of the course, student meeting hours, types and number of mid-term studies, and the percentages of contributions of mid-term studies and final exams to the success grade.

(7) The evaluation grades for the course during the semester are announced before the last week of the relevant semester.

(8) Except for courses decided otherwise by the relevant unit board of directors, mid-term exams are held between the 5th and 12th weeks for each course. Mid-term exam dates are announced within the first two weeks of the relevant semester. In order to take the mid-term exams of a course, the student must be registered for the course. Students who fail due to absence until the mid-term exam dates cannot take the mid-term exams, and even if they have taken them, their exams are considered invalid.

(9) Mid-term evaluations may replace the mid-term exam grade.

(10) The right to take a make-up exam is granted only for mid-term exams. In exceptional cases defined by the principles determined by the Senate, a make-up exam is held by the faculty member responsible for the course on 3 specified dates. Make-up exams are held once for each course in each semester, regardless of the number of mid-term exams.

(11) For students assigned by the Rectorate, a number of make-up exams are held for each course in each semester.

Achievement Grade and Achievement Evaluation Method

(1) The success grade is calculated from the mid-term evaluation and end-of-term exam grades. In this calculation, the grade the student receives from each evaluation tool is multiplied by the contribution rate (weight) of the relevant evaluation tool to the success grade, based on the Course Application Form announced before the relevant semester begins, and the calculation result is rounded to an integer. The rounding process is as follows; if the first digit after the decimal point is less than five, without changing the units digit; if it is five or greater, the units digit is increased by one.

(2) The raw success grade calculated out of 100 is converted to a letter success grade using the Relative Evaluation System or the instructor's discretion.

(3) The relative evaluation system is not used in internships, term projects, graduation projects, graduation thesis, seminar courses and similar courses. 4

(4) In courses where the relative evaluation system and instructor's discretion are applied, the student's end-of-term exam grade must be at least YSAS in order to be evaluated. Students who fall below this grade are directly considered to have failed.

(5) For courses that cannot be evaluated with the Relative Evaluation System, the distribution of end-of-term raw success grades is used and the letter grades corresponding to the success degrees are determined at the discretion of the instructor giving the course based on the Success Grade Catalog Values ​​given in Table 1. The instructor may lower or not increase the score ranges in Table 1.

RAW SUCCESS

GRADE SUCCESS GRADE COUNT DESCRIPTION

90 – 100 AA 4.00 Successful

85-89 BA 3.50 Successful

75-84 BB 3.00 Successful

70-74 CB 2.50 Successful

60-69 CC 2.00 Successful

55 – 59 DC 1.50 Conditional Successful

50 – 54 DD 1.00 Conditional Successful

0 – 49 FF 0.00 Fail

To oversee the quality of higher education programs;

- YÖK is responsible for planning, organizing, managing and supervising education and training and other activities in higher education institutions.

- "University Monitoring and Evaluation Reports" of higher education institutions prepared within the framework of the criteria determined by YÖK are published every year. The reports prepared according to these reports, including quantitative and qualitative evaluations of higher education institutions, are shared with the public by YÖK.

- "Foundation Higher Education Institutions Report" containing academic, administrative and financial data of foundation higher education institutions is published annually by CoHE. These reports, which include quantitative and qualitative evaluations of foundation higher education institutions, are shared with the public by YÖK. Quality assurance of undergraduate programs in higher education is ensured according to the "Procedures and Principles for Ensuring Quality Assurance of Higher Education Diploma Programs":

1. Creation and Approval of Curricula: YÖK determines the minimum standards and criteria required for the opening of undergraduate departments and programs in higher education institutions.

1.1. The curriculum of undergraduate programs in higher education institutions and the learning outcomes that each program will provide to the student are determined by the senates of higher education institutions in accordance with the basic principles determined by YÖK on these issues.

1.2. The curricula of the National Core Curricula are adopted by the relevant Council of Deans and implemented by higher education institutions with the approval of the Council of Higher Education.

2. Assessment and Evaluation: The measurement and evaluation of the learning outcomes of each undergraduate program is carried out according to the teaching and examination regulations prepared by higher education institutions in accordance with the basic principles determined by YÖK on these issues.

3. Certification: Students enrolled in undergraduate programs, if they successfully complete the course credits and other obligations determined by higher education institutions; receive a bachelor's diploma.

4. Self-Assessment-External Evaluation: Higher education institutions, in the context of continuous monitoring, enter the "Institutional Internal Evaluation Reports" of the previous year into the Information System prepared by the Higher Education Quality Council (YÖKAK) at the beginning of each year. YÖKAK shares the "Institutional Feedback Report" prepared for the external evaluation of higher education institutions with the public. In addition, accreditation decisions issued by accreditation bodies authorized or recognized by YÖKAK also indicate that the quality assurance of the qualifications of the programs is ensured. YÖKAK conducts regular review activities regarding the qualifications determined in accordance with the legislation.

• Secondary education institutions or equivalency by the Ministry of National Education graduated from approved foreign secondary education institutions and admission requirements for undergraduate programs of higher education institutions to have provided.
• To have completed the Measurement, Selection and The central exam held by the Placement Center (ÖSYM) as a result of the relevant undergraduate program of the higher education institution to have been placed.
• Higher education programs, the procedures and principles of which are determined by YÖK programs that accept students through special talent exams for the central exam conducted by ÖSYM to have taken and passed the special talent exam.
• The procedures and principles determined by YÖK and conducted by ÖSYM For associate degree graduates as a result of the Vertical Transfer Exam (DGS) in higher education institutions that are a continuation of the fields they have completed to be placed in undergraduate programs.

• Those with a bachelor's degree can apply to master's programs and related If they meet the requirements, they can continue to graduate programs accepted with a bachelor's degree.
• Undergraduate students may continue their studies at the higher education institutions have the right to participate in the double major programs they open. Double major programs, students enrolled in two diploma programs simultaneously and if they are successful, they will receive two separate undergraduate diplomas. they can take

1. Higher Education Law No. 2547

1.1. Regulation on the Principles of Transferring Between Associate and Undergraduate Programs, Double Major, Minor and Inter-Institutional Credit Transfer in Higher Education Institutions

1.2. Regulation on the Continuation of Graduates of Vocational Schools and Open Education Associate Degree Programs to Undergraduate Education

2. Law No. 2547 on Higher Education (Additional Article-35)

2.1. Regulation on Higher Education Quality Assurance and Higher Education Quality Board

Qualification is continuous